• News
  • Film and TV
  • Music
  • Tech
  • Features
  • Celebrity
  • Politics
  • Weird
  • Community
  • Advertise
  • Terms
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • LADbible Group
  • LADbible
  • SPORTbible
  • GAMINGbible
  • Tyla
  • UNILAD Tech
  • FOODbible
  • License Our Content
  • About Us & Contact
  • Jobs
  • Latest
  • Topics A-Z
  • Authors
Facebook
Instagram
X
Threads
TikTok
YouTube
Submit Your Content
Scientists claim Jesus 'wasn't called Jesus' and that the Son of God actually went by something else

Home> News> US News

Published 21:02 21 Jan 2025 GMT

Scientists claim Jesus 'wasn't called Jesus' and that the Son of God actually went by something else

'Jesus Christ' wasn't Jesus' full, first or second name, according to historians

Joe Yates

Joe Yates

Featured Image Credit: Getty Stock Image/Justin Setterfield/Getty Images

Topics: Religion, History, Science

Joe Yates
Joe Yates

Joe is a journalist for UNILAD, who particularly enjoys writing about crime. He has worked in journalism for five years, and has covered everything from murder trials to celeb news.

X

@JMYjourno

Advert

Advert

Advert

Throughout our entire lives we've 'understood' that Jesus is called Jesus... I mean, if we're told someone is called something, you don't really question it.

But according to scientists Jesus 'wasn't called Jesus' and in fact, the Son of God went by a different name.

Jesus was born around 2,030 years ago - if we're to believe the historians.

"The narrowest date one can confidently arrive at for Jesus’s birth seems to be the month of March, during the years 6, 5, or 4 BC," explained Professor Lawrence Mykytiuk of Purdue University in Indiana, to the MailOnline.

Advert

Anyway, scholars believe 'Jesus Christ' might not be the lord's name at all, with historians citing that the Son of God's name would have been in his native language of Aramaic, which doesn't sound anything like it does now.

Then there's the fact that the name 'Jesus' didn't actually exist when he was alive, and there's even letters that wouldn't have appeared in written language until around 1,500 years after Jesus' death.

Then, as the story of Jesus was shared, the name transitioned from his native language to Hebrew, then Greek, followed by Latin and in the 16th century... English. So, his name went through a lengthy period of translation, it would appear.

'Jesus Christ' would not have gone by the name 'Jesus Christ' while he was living (Getty Stock Images)
'Jesus Christ' would not have gone by the name 'Jesus Christ' while he was living (Getty Stock Images)

Advert

So, what is Jesus' real name?

Professor Dineke Houtman of the Protestant Theological University, in the Netherlands, has claimed it would have most likely been Yeshua or possibly its shorter name, Yeshu.

Professor Houtman told the MailOnline: "His name would probably have been in Aramaic: Yeshua.

"It is likely that this is also how he introduced himself. Another possibility is the shorter form Yeshu which is the form used in later rabbinic literature."

Advert

It makes sense as Jesus wasn't English and being in the Middle East, it's safe to say he wouldn't have spoken our tongue either - also names beginning with a hard 'J' as we'd pronounce it, didn't exist either.

Yeshu Nazareen doesn't have as much of a ring to it! (Getty Stock Image)
Yeshu Nazareen doesn't have as much of a ring to it! (Getty Stock Image)

While an expert on early Christianity from the University of Birmingham, Professor Candida Moss, backed up Houtman's belief.

She told the publication: "Most scholars agree that his name was Yeshua or possibly Yeshu, which was one of the most common names in first-century Galilee."

Advert

So, is Jesus' real name Yeshua Christ?

Well, no. Christ derives from the Greek word 'Christos' which means 'anointed one'.

His surname would have likely been related to his hometown of Nazareth, with his name likely to have been Yeshu Nazareen.

Choose your content:

6 hours ago
8 hours ago
  • 6 hours ago

    Cult classic film removed from Disney+ over controversial scene that had it banned from TV

    The British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) has long expressed its concerns about the scene in the 1989 movie

    Film & TV
  • 8 hours ago

    Vin Diesel hints Paul Walker could be in upcoming Fast and Furious movie and it's left fans very divided

    He's desperate to reunite Dom and Brian

    Film & TV
  • 8 hours ago

    Trump supporters are revealing the ‘red line’ that would make them stop supporting him and people say it’s ‘disturbing’

    President Trump's shocking approval ratings were recently released

    News
  • 8 hours ago

    Starbucks customer outraged after barista allegedly wrote 'illegal' joke on her cup

    "When I read it I’m like, OK. Was I supposed to laugh?"

    News
  • Scientists share exactly where 'Jesus was born' as they claim it's unlikely it was in Bethlehem
  • Archaeologists discover something 'sensational' at the location of Jesus' resurrection
  • Scientists find evidence that confirms the Bible's Adam and Eve 'actually existed'
  • Scientists claim Jesus’ burial spot could hold new biblical clues surrounding his death and resurrection