unilad homepage
unilad homepage
    • News
      • UK News
      • US News
      • World News
      • Crime
      • Health
      • Money
      • Sport
      • Travel
    • Music
    • Technology
    • Film and TV
      • News
      • DC Comics
      • Disney
      • Marvel
      • Netflix
    • Celebrity
    • Politics
    • Advertise
    • Terms
    • Privacy & Cookies
    • LADbible Group
    • LADbible
    • SPORTbible
    • GAMINGbible
    • Tyla
    • UNILAD Tech
    • FOODbible
    • License Our Content
    • About Us & Contact
    • Jobs
    • Latest
    • Archive
    • Topics A-Z
    • Authors
    Facebook
    Instagram
    X
    Threads
    TikTok
    YouTube
    Submit Your Content
    Mars declared unsafe for humans to live as no one can survive for longer than four years

    Home> News

    Published 13:42 2 Jun 2023 GMT+1

    Mars declared unsafe for humans to live as no one can survive for longer than four years

    Scientists have warned that there should be a strict time limit on missions to Mars

    Dominic Smithers

    Dominic Smithers

    google discoverFollow us on Google Discover
    Featured Image Credit: Alamy / SpaceEnhanced / PandorumBS

    Topics: Science, US News, NASA

    Dominic Smithers
    Dominic Smithers

    Dominic Smithers is the News/Agenda Desk Lead, covering the latest trends and breaking stories. After graduating from the University of Leeds with a degree in French and History, he went on to write for the Manchester Evening News, the Accrington Observer and the Macclesfield Express. So as you can imagine, he’s spent many a night wondering just how useful that second language has been. But c'est la vie.

    X

    @SmithersDom

    Advert

    Advert

    Advert

    For years, there's been talk of one day mankind living on Mars.

    And in recent times, with the likes of Elon Musk seemingly on a one-man crusade to get there first, it looks like it might happen fairly soon.

    But according to one of the most recent studies into the viability of human life on the Red Planet, it might not be as easy as you'd think.

    Advert

    Yep, research carried out by team at UCLA looked to answer two key questions - the first being around the impact of particle radiation and whether it would pose too grave a threat to human life.

    The second was whether the timing of a mission to Mars could protect astronauts and the spacecraft from radiation?

    To answer both questions, the scientists used geophysical models of particle radiation for a solar cycle and models of how radiation could affect both human passengers and a spacecraft.

    Now, the good news is that the answers to their two questions were 'no' and 'yes', respectively.

    According to the scientists' calculations, the spacecraft should provide enough protection during the round trip to and from Mars for the astronauts.

    Scientists believe missions to Mars shouldn't last more than four years.
    Plrang GFX/Alamy

    However, if the material the spacecraft is built with is too thick, then it could actually increase the amount of secondary radiation.

    They also noted that this would largely be dependent on the timing of the mission as well.

    Researchers claimed the best time to leave Earth would be when the solar activity is at its peak.

    This is because during the 'solar maximum' the most dangerous particles are deflected, thus shielding the astronauts from the worst of it.

    On the other hand, the bad news is that experts recommended humans should spend no longer than four years on any mission to the planet.

    According to the study, which was published in the Advancing Earth and Science Journal, beyond this point, the levels of radiation become unsafe.

    The Red Planet.
    mikolajn/Alamy

    It reads: "Our calculations clearly demonstrate that the best time for launching a human space flight to Mars is during the solar maximum, as it is possible to shield from Solar Energetic Particles.

    "Our simulations show that an increase in shielding creates an increase in secondary radiation produced by the most energetic GCR, which results in a higher dose, introducing a limit to a mission duration.

    "We estimate that a potential mission to Mars should not exceed approximately four years.

    "This study shows that space radiation imposes strict limitations and presents technological difficulties for the human mission to Mars, such a mission is still viable."

    Choose your content:

    2 mins ago
    an hour ago
    2 hours ago
    • Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images
      2 mins ago

      Trump tells little girl she's 'too short to play volleyball' in 'hard to watch' exchange

      The little girl's dreams were quickly squashed by the president

      News
    • Richard Lautens/Toronto Star via Getty Images
      an hour ago

      Family of woman who's physically fit but wants assisted suicide shares what they think about her decision

      Claire Brosseau has claimed Canada's assisted suicide laws are discriminatory

      News
    • AFP via Getty Image
      an hour ago

      Canary Island leader refuses to allow virus-hit cruise ship to dock there

      The president of the Canary Islands, Fernando Clavijo, has spoken out on the plans for the cruise ship to travel there

      News
    • Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images
      2 hours ago

      Trump accused of going 'too far' after making comments on Iran war in front of school kids in Oval Office

      The president didn't hold back when giving an honest review of the war in Iran

      News
    • Mars declared unsafe for humans to live as no one can survive for longer than four years
    • Mars declared unsafe for humans to live as scientists explain why it'd never work
    • Trump welcomes Artemis ll crew and claims he would have 'no trouble' making it as an astronaut
    • Biohacker who’s trying to ‘live forever’ claims you can last longer than 99% of humanity with three simple habits